“It’s a new round of the arms race,” he said. “These missiles don’t exist now, we will have to create them, and it’s a heavy financial burden.”
“A definite loser is Europe, a definite loser is Russia, and for the United States the situation won’t change, the number of warheads targeting US territory won’t increase,” he added.
The latest back-and-forth over the INF treaty comes amid high tensions after Russia seized three Ukrainian ships off Crimea and deployed anti-ship and anti-air missiles to the peninsula, which it annexed in 2014.
Ukraine has declared martial law and has called up military reservists, claiming that Russia has been building up troops for a potential ground invasion.
The deployment of the new Russian laser system announced on Tuesday, while surely meant to intimidate Western adversaries, won’t change the balance of power.
Laser weapons, which are already in service with the US navy and are being tested by the US army, are not powerful enough to bring down a plane. But they could discourage reconnaissance around sensitive targets including nuclear missile bases, Mr Kornev said.
“Like any modern camera, the camera on a satellite has a sensor, a CCD sensor, that could be destroyed by a high-power laser, just burned up. Then this camera would be blinded,” he said.