Abramovich set to file criminal complaint following Swiss money laundering allegations

The Chelsea owner’s attorney has replied to claims in Switzerland that alleged the Russian businessman was involved in criminal activities

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich’s lawyers have confirmed they will launch a criminal complaint following claims in Switzerland that he was “involved in money laundering.”

Abramovich had been looking to become a Swiss resident, but allegations in a national newspaper on Tuesday claimed that the 51-year-old is a “threat to public security and a reputational risk.”

The article also reported that Abramovich was known to the police “for suspicion of money laundering” as well as claiming “the applicant’s assets are at least partially of illegal origin.”

The Russian businessman’s attorney Daniel Glasl has strongly denied the claims, stating that he wants the Swiss police to publicly correct the facts, while also indicating plans of a criminal complaint for whoever disseminated the information.

“We are extremely disappointed by the release and publication of confidential information from Swiss government files regarding Mr Abramovich, which occurred in clear violation of Swiss criminal law and Swiss data protection laws,” a statement read.

“We have filed a request for correction of facts to the Swiss Federal Police and will be filing a criminal complaint against unknown persons responsible for dissemination of this confidential information. We also reserve our options for addressing this breach in court.

“Any suggestion that Mr Abramovich has been involved in money laundering or has contacts with criminal organisations is entirely false. Mr Abramovich has never been charged with participating in money laundering and does not have a criminal record. He has never had, or been alleged to have, connections with criminal organisations.”

Following the Salisbury poisoning in March, relations between the United Kingdom and Russia have been strained, with many Russians finding it difficult to obtain visas. Abramovich withdrew his application before obtaining Israeli citizenship in May.

Around the same time, plans for the redevelopment of Chelsea’s new stadium were put on hold, but the club denied that this had any connection to their owner’s visa application nor claims that he wanted to sell his stake in the Premier League side.

'Arsenal can't afford to let Welbeck leave' – Wright sees new contract as a top priority

The England international is approaching the end of his current deal and could drop into the free agent pool next summer if no extension is agreed

Arsenal cannot afford to let Danny Welbeck walk away as a free agent, says club legend Ian Wright.

The England international is approaching the end of his current deal and has no extension in place as yet.

Such a situation has become all too familiar for the Gunners, with Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez having seen contract discussions drag on last season – the latter of whom departed for Old Trafford in January.

Aaron Ramsey is also in the same position this term, with Arsenal having been unable to put fresh terms in place with experienced senior stars.

Wright believes they should be making talks with Welbeck a top priority, with the former Manchester United forward an important presence in the squad despite his form and fitness issues.

The Arsenal icon told Sky Sports when quizzed on whether the 27-year-old has a role to play under Unai Emery: “Yes I certainly do.

“Where he is right now, behind [Alexandre] Lacazette and [Pierre-Emerick] Aubameyang, coming off the bench with his experience.

“And the fact that he is capable of scoring goals against all types of opposition.

“He’s someone that I think Arsenal should definitely try to sign up for the long term.

“He’s valuable to Arsenal. I think he’s got eight to 10 goals in him over the course of a season.

“In the current climate, I don’t think Arsenal can afford to let someone like that go.”

Welbeck, who is now into his fifth season in north London, has been restricted to just 118 appearances in total for the Gunners.

He has managed 31 goals across those outings, with four of those coming this season – including two in his most recent showing against Brentford in the Carabao Cup.

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

Kaapo Kakko growing frustrated with Rangers situation

It’s hard to know exactly what Kaapo Kakko was expecting of his first month with the Rangers, but it likely wasn’t this.

The No. 2-overall pick showed a little bit of frustration with his situation while speaking to a media outlet from his native Finland after the team’s fourth straight loss, a 3-2 defeat to the visiting Canucks on Sunday. While some things may have gotten lost in translation, it is still clear the 18-year-old has wanted to contribute more — and was hoping for more opportunity to do so.

“Hockey isn’t very much fun for me right now,” Kakko told Eastside Media, with the translation clarified by the story’s reporter, Pasi Tuominen. “Things haven’t been working out, and sometimes I feel like I could be on the ice a bit more. It would be cool to get a chance on the first line at some point. I understand that it hasn’t been realistic so far, since I haven’t really showed much.”

Kakko has shown flashes of brilliance, none brighter than his first career NHL goal on a great backhand from in close on Oct. 12. But having played with men back in Finland, and having been a key contributor to the gold medal his team won at the World Championships in May, Kakko is not satisfied with a slow learning curve in North America.

“My goal is to have a leading role,” he said. “I don’t want to hear any talk about how I’m the youngest guy and I need to be given time to get used to the style. I want to be the guy who scores goals and wins games right away.”

There have only been sporadic shifts when coach David Quinn has put Kakko up on the right side of that top line, with Artemi Panarin and Mika Zibanejad.

Mostly, Kakko has been in a second-line role with a rotating cast of linemates, expected to start Tuesday night’s Garden match against the Coyotes alongside

Brett Howden and Chris Kreider. Quinn did move him up to the first power-play unit, and is hoping that could help get him going.

“There are so many things at this level that a 18-year-old has never been asked to do, and he’s never even thought about doing it,” Quinn said recently. “I’ve said this a lot, but it’s almost unfair for a kid like him that gets here, because the game he’s been playing to this point isn’t going to happen from here on in.”

Another contributing factor would be the fact that the Rangers had so few games at the start of the season. They played two games, and then sat for five days.

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

Then they played one game, and sat for another four.

That didn’t make it any easier for Kakko to get acclimated, even if the schedule has started to normalize over the past few days.

see also

Why Rangers need to give Kaapo Kakko a bigger role


It is true in the macro sense that what is…

“The days have been a bit boring at times, since we’ve played so little. I’ve mostly been watching shows on the tablet,” Kakko said. “Now we’ll get to play properly and hopefully I can get more ice time. I think my game will start to roll better too.”

Like most teenagers, Kakko also looked at the stats to see he had only that one goal, no assists, and a minus-6 rating. He was averaging 15:21 of ice time per game, the seventh-most among forwards — although his average of 12:56 of even-strength ice was fourth-most.

“A player wants to play,” Kakko said. “You want to show that you can play well. After the first two games I was already frustrated, especially since my game wasn’t what I was expecting.”

So Kakko might be expecting more from himself, and the Rangers are hoping to watch him get better as his rookie season goes on.

“When you have that talent, he’s going to learn — because he wants to learn, and he’s committed to being a great player,” Quinn said. “There is absolutely zero reservations what we have with him. It’s just going to be a process, and it’s going to take some time.”

Rangers’ hole gets deeper with concerning loss to Coyotes

The reality of the situation is coming up at the Rangers rather fast, and they know it.

“Obviously we’re not in a great spot right now, and we have to dig ourselves out,” coach David Quinn said after his team managed to steal a point with a 3-2 overtime loss to the visiting Coyotes on Tuesday night at the Garden, extending the Blueshirts’ winless streak to five games.

“Obviously we were better in the second period, and better in the third. But certainly nowhere near where we need to be if we’re going to have a season.”

Already, the specter of sacrificing another season to this rebuild is staring the Blueshirts (2-4-1) in the face. Already, they need a quick turnaround before things start to get away from them — assuming it hasn’t already happened.

“It’s not going to happen overnight,” Quinn said. “I hope it does. But you just have to dig your way out.”

It’s not just the losses piling up that is so disconcerting, but the lapses in play, in focus, in effort, in defending. If it wasn’t for the terrific 32-save performance from Alexandar Georgiev, and two timely goals from Tony DeAngelo, this would have been as disjointed a performance as the 3-2 loss to the visiting Canucks on Sunday — which drew a couple loud voices in the locker room during the second intermission.

No screaming before or after this one, not after the Rangers were outshot 21-4 in the first period, and not after Christian Dvorak beat Georgiev with a slick shot 1:04 into the three-on-three extra period. Quinn, at least, expressed a clear-eyed, candid view of the big picture. But after taking so many lumps this early on, optimism isn’t the easiest thing to find right now.

“It’s going to take a little time, and we’re going to stay at it,” Quinn said. “We know we’re a lot better than this.”

There are flashes of the talent that general manager Jeff Gorton brought in this offseason, but those flashes are often sandwiched by horrendous periods of puck management and defending. So often was the front of the net left wide open, and so often were the Coyotes (5-2-1) of Derek Stepan flying up the ice with speed after a turnover.

The Rangers’ penchant for taking penalties doesn’t help, either. Pavel Buchnevich took one in each of the first two periods, the second resulting in a power-play goal for Alex Goligoski at 13:46 that gave Arizona a 2-1 lead.

DeAngelo equalized that one with a power-play goal of his own, coming on a nice feed from Ryan Strome at 18:00 of the second that made it 2-2. DeAngelo also scored at 5:04 of the second to negate the game-opening goal from Lawson Crouse, that one coming when an attempt at defending in front from Brendan Lemieux left his head spinning.

see also

Kaapo Kakko growing frustrated with Rangers situation


It’s hard to know exactly what Kaapo Kakko was expecting…

“Maybe it doesn’t look like we’re desperate, but I think we are,” said DeAngelo, who played his 100th game as a Ranger. “The other teams have had good pushes, and we haven’t found a way to push back fast enough.”

The Rangers certainly got better as the game went on, but that is more an indictment of how bad they were in the first. They ended up having a season-low 19 shots on goalie Darcy Kemper, who didn’t make many memorable saves.

When the Rangers were trying to press in the third period, Quinn cut his bench down, to no avail. Both teams played conservatively into the extra period, but eventually, another game got away from the Blueshirts. They’re just hoping it’s not the season that gets away from them next.

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

“This game is simple but it’s hard. We’re just not doing the basics of what you need to do to have success right now, consistently,” Quinn said. “Sometimes we do it, more often we don’t do it. You can feel it, we’re in a little bit of a rut. We have to skate, and get our way out of it.”

Brendan Lemieux’s ‘tough’ night lands him on Rangers bench

Click:Guizhou Attractions

The bench got cut down, and Brendan Lemieux was on the outside looking in.

As the Rangers extended their winless streak to five games with a 3-2 overtime loss to the Coyotes on Tuesday night at the Garden, coach David Quinn went to nine forwards and Lemieux wasn’t one of them.

The gritty winger got only one shift over the final 14:20, and finished with 11:07 of ice time overall.

“I thought Lemieux had a tough night,” said Quinn, who also kept Lias Andersson and Greg McKegg on the bench, while Brendan Smith, previously a full-time defenseman, was out there pushing for a lead. “Smitty has been consistent with his effort and his energy. We ended up taking a penalty because Lemieux turned it over.

“But [Lemieux] has played well for us. I just thought it was one of those nights he didn’t have it.”

see also

Kaapo Kakko growing frustrated with Rangers situation


It’s hard to know exactly what Kaapo Kakko was expecting…


Quinn went with the reliable Jesper Fast in the top-line role alongside Artemi Panarin and Mika Zibanejad, but was often rotating Chris Kreider into that spot over the second and third periods. That also happened after some of the Rangers five penalty kills, as Kreider doesn’t currently kill penalties.

“Just changing it up from time to time, giving Kreids and opportunity,” Quinn said.


Goalie Alexandar Georgiev was terrific in his third start of the season, making 32 saves and often keeping his disjointed team in the game.

“I try to keep the team in the game all the time,” Georgiev said. “I don’t think too much about the score. Just try to play the same way, every shot.”

Georgiev was bombarded with 21 shots in the first period, but turned all of them aside except for one from Lawson Crouse, left alone in front at 13:06.

see also

Rangers hole gets deeper with concerning loss


The reality of the situation is coming up at the…

“It’s important to start right,” Georgiev said. “I was solid from the start.”

The 23-year-old said he needs to look at the video to decide what he might be able to do better on the overtime winner from Christian Dvorak, who beat him up high inside the near post.


Defenseman Tony DeAngelo scored twice in his 100th game with the Rangers, which also happened to come against a Coyotes team that traded him here in the summer of 2017 as part of the deal that sent Derek Stepan and Antti Raanta to Arizona.

“I’m sure that plays a role against a team that traded him,” Quinn said.


Micheal Haley was a healthy scratch, as McKegg drew back in after being out on Sunday.

Rangers’ glue guy Jesper Fast deserves contract extension

Rick Nash set up shop here, and over the last four years so have a bundle of big-time pros including Ryan McDonagh, Derek Stepan, Dan Girardi, Marc Staal, Mats Zuccarello and Henrik Lundqvist.

And for each one of these seasons beginning with 2015-2016, Jesper Fast has been selected as the Players’ Player by a vote of his peers. Which is something even if you were unaware franchise royalty Jean Ratelle (1968-69 through 1979-71) and Brian Leetch (2000-01 through 2003-04) are the only two other athletes to have won the award four consecutive times since its inception in 1958-59.

“He is everything you want a teammate to be, on and off the ice,” Mika Zibanejad, who joined forces in New York with his fellow Swede in 2016-17, told The Post. “He does the little things shift-in and shift-out — forechecks, is hard on the puck, blocks shots. He sacrifices every day.

“Off the ice, he is a friend to everyone. Maybe he is not rewarded with the offensive numbers, but everyone here knows how important he is to our team. You can’t ask for more.”

Every Rangers forward wants No. 17 on his line. It has been that way for years. Ryan Strome, after hooking up with Fast for 7:01 at five-on-five in Sunday’s 3-2 defeat to Vancouver and quite unsolicited, gestured toward the winger’s vacant locker adjacent to his and said, “I love playing with this guy.”

Past tense, presently, for it will be Zibanejad (and left wing Artemi Panarin) who will reap the dividends of playing with Fast on Tuesday at MSG against the Coyotes, per the line shuffling orchestrated by David Quinn under which Chris Kreider will shift back to his natural left side with Brett Howden and right wing Kaapo Kakko while Strome skates between Brendan Lemieux and Pavel Buchnevich.

“He works hard and he keeps it simple,” Strome told The Post. “He’s not flashy, but he has more subtle skills that make his teammates better. He hunts the puck in tough areas, he’ll battle every time, he holds onto the puck, he goes to the net.

“He’s absolutely not a sexy player — and that’s nothing about his sexuality — but his work ethic sets the standard for the team. If he speaks up, you pay attention to what he says. He’s the guy who sets the example. His impact is obvious to everyone in this room.”

As I mentioned to Strome, I do not believe that I had ever before scribbled the words, “And that’s nothing about his sexuality,” into more than 30 years’ worth of notebooks. That, Strome and I agreed, is a good thing.

Fast has gotten a considerable amount of time on the top six even if he is more likely a bottom-six guy on a stronger team. He complements skill guys. But it wouldn’t matter whether his linemates were Tim Gettinger and Steven Fogarty rather than Zibanejad and Panarin. He’d play the same tenacious way.

“All my life, I have just tried to be myself,” Fast told The Post. “I want to play well, I want to do my job, be responsible at both ends of the ice and make it easier for my teammates. If they feel I am giving 100 percent for them, they will be there for me. No one succeeds without teamwork.

“Off the ice, I am not the most vocal guy, but I talk to guys if I see they are down and try to make them happy. I want to be a friend who is there for them. I try to be me.”

see also

Rangers cant let themselves cheat this rebuild


Everyone wants this not only to work, but to work…

Fast was the Rangers’ sixth-round, 157th-overall selection in the 2010 entry draft. Mark Stone, at 178, is the only player selected later with more NHL games played than Fast, 393 to 359. Stone is also the only player selected later in the draft to have outscored the New York winger, 334 points to 122. So, a success there for the scouting department.

The Kreider contract situation has received a fair amount of attention, but Fast is an impending free agent as well. This one is not complicated. Fast has far more value to the team wearing the Blueshirt than as a rental property who might bring back a second- or third-rounder in a deadline trade.

The Rangers need glue guys who play the game the correct way as they incorporate more and more youth into the lineup. Turning 28 next month, Fast has earned a multi-year extension off his current three-year deal worth an AAV of $1.85 million.

“I love New York, I love playing for the Rangers,” Fast said. “There have been some ups and downs, but I’m proud to be here and proud to be a New York Ranger.

“If they want to talk to me, I’m happy to do that. I would love to stay here.”

Click Here: Tienda Monterrey

Brexit Watch: Why The Move To Suspend U.K. Parliament Matters

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson maneuvered Wednesday to give his political opponents less time to block a no-deal Brexit split from Europe before the Oct. 31 withdrawal deadline, winning Queen Elizabeth II’s approval to suspend Parliament.

Even by the standards of the Brexit era, this has been an extraordinarily turbulent week for the United Kingdom.

Queen Elizabeth II agreed to grant Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s request to suspend Parliament, just as legislators are rising to block his threat to crash the country out of the European Union.

A legislative recess may sound ho-hum, but the news was a shock. It appeared to set Britain up to quit the EU on Oct. 31 without first agreeing on terms of the divorce — a “no-deal Brexit,” which analysts say would damage the economies of the U.K. and the EU.

Here’s a look at what happened, why it matters and what comes next.

What did Boris Johnson do?

He got the queen to agree to suspend Parliament on or soon after Sept. 9 until Oct. 14. That gives lawmakers considerably less time to debate or try to stop a no-deal Brexit. Parliament is on record as opposing the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU without an agreement.

The queen is the U.K.’s nonpolitical head of state, and Prime Minister Johnson is the head of government. It is normal for Parliament to take a break before a new government presents its agenda, so many British analysts believe Elizabeth could not reasonably refuse the request. But this suspension is unusually long, and it is extraordinary given that Brexit — the biggest and most divisive issue in Britain in decades — is just around the corner.

What’s the big deal?

Britons are struggling to recall any previous prime minister in modern times doing something like this: seeming to deliberately squeeze Parliament to prevent it from expressing its democratic will. Johnson says the suspension just gives him room to work on the agenda for his new government and there will be ample time to discuss Brexit. Most analysts are deeply skeptical.

What has been the response?

Voters who want the U.K. to stay in the EU — Remainers — are furious, and there was a sizable street protest outside Parliament on Wednesday when Johnson announced his move. Momentum, the grassroots group set up to support Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the opposition Labour Party, and trade unions are calling for protests on Saturday in Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, London, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, Oxford, Sheffield and York, and another in London on Tuesday when Parliament returns.

John Bercow, speaker of the House of Commons, called the suspension of Parliament a “constitutional outrage.” Labour legislators call it a “coup.” Newspaper editorials have been withering. The Financial Times called the decision “an affront to democracy.” “Boris Johnson has detonated a bomb under the constitutional apparatus of the United Kingdom,” the paper said in an editorial on Wednesday. “Mr. Johnson may not be a tyrant, but he has set a dangerous precedent.”

The Telegraph, which supports Brexit and where Johnson writes a column, said the prime minister was fighting fire with fire. “The real outrage in this saga is not the suspension of Parliament,” the editors wrote, “but the behaviour of parliamentary Remainers.” The paper insists those against Brexit are devoted to stopping it and defying the will of voters who approved the decision in a 2016 referendum.

More than 1.6 million people have signed a government website petition opposing Johnson’s suspension of Parliament. The petition was started by a pro-EU citizen earlier this month but is expected to have little political effect.

Responses in the EU have been very negative, as expected.

“What Johnson is creating here is the kind of political madhouse befitting a military dictatorship,” wrote Barbara Wesel, senior European correspondent at Germany’s DW. “It is anti-democratic and matches the havoc wreaked by US President Donald Trump and Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.”

Writing in a tweet, Guy Verhofstadt, a former prime minister of Belgium who is the European Parliament’s Brexit coordinator, said, “Suppressing debate on profound choices is unlikely to help deliver a stable future EU-UK relationship.”

What are opponents of a no-deal Brexit going to do?

Pro-Remain parliamentarians are expected to try to pass legislation that would block a no-deal Brexit, forcing Johnson to return to Brussels and ask for yet another extension (the original withdrawal was due March 29). This is not easily done in the British parliamentary system, where the prime minister’s administration controls the legislative agenda and time is of the essence. No-deal opponents are likely to find an ally, though, in Bercow, who is a passionate supporter of parliamentary sovereignty and was infuriated by Johnson’s move.

What’s the counterargument to the outrage?

Proponents argue that the Brexit process has dragged out for more than three years and it is time to leave one way or the other. “The people want some action,” Sue Lamb, a pro-Brexit voter who grows flowers in Lincolnshire, in the English Midlands, told NPR. “So if this is what it takes to actually make something happen then so be it.” Brexiteers also say that pro-EU lawmakers in the U.K. are bent on sabotaging the withdrawal any way they can and that they are the ones who are truly anti-democratic.

What’s the timetable now?

Sept. 3: Parliament returns from summer recess.

Sept. 4: The prime minister holds a weekly question session in the House of Commons, which could be explosive.

As early as Sept. 9 or as late as Sept. 12: Parliament will shut down.

Sept. 21-25: The Labour Party holds its annual convention in Brighton.

Sept. 29 to Oct. 2: The Conservative Party holds its convention in Manchester.

Oct. 14: Parliament returns and Johnson rolls out his government’s agenda in what is known as the Queen’s Speech.

Oct. 31: The United Kingdom is scheduled to leave the EU. This is written into U.K. law, so it does not require an affirmative vote from Parliament.

2 Giuliani Associates Arrested On Campaign Finance Violations

Associates of President Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani have been arrested on campaign finance charges.

Updated at 7:15 p.m. ET

Two Florida-based businessmen who helped President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani in his efforts to dig up dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine have been arrested and charged with campaign finance violations in a separate matter.

Click Here: Tienda Fútbol de Leon

Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman were arrested at Dulles International Airport outside Washington, D.C., on Wednesday night, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan. They were indicted by a grand jury in New York but are scheduled to make their initial court appearance in federal court in Virginia later this afternoon.

An attorney for the two men did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Giuliani declined to comment.

According to the indictment, Parnas and Fruman face two counts of conspiracy and one count each of false statements and falsification of business records. Two others, David Correia and Andrey Kukushkin, each face one count of conspiracy.

The indictment alleges the men “conspired to circumvent the federal laws against foreign influence by engaging in a scheme to funnel foreign money to candidates for federal and state office so that the defendants could buy potential influence with candidates, campaigns, and the candidates’ governments.”

The indictment lays out two separate conspiracies that Parnas and Fruman allegedly engaged in.

In one, court papers say, they set up a limited liability company, Global Energy Producers, through which they made $340,000 in contributions to two political action committees.

The contributions, the indictment alleges, were made in order to gain influence with politicians and help Parnas and Fruman “advance their own personal financial interests and the political interests of Ukrainian government officials, including at least one Ukrainian government official with whom they were working.”

The indictment says Parnas and Fruman met with a member of Congress identified only as “congressman-1” during the 2018 election cycle, for whom they had committed to raise $20,000.

The two met with the congressman and sought his “assistance” in getting the then-U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, removed. The indictment says Parnas was working on this effort, at least in part, at the request of more Ukrainian government officials.

Yovanovitch ultimately was removed from her post this spring amid complaints from Giuliani and others. In the controversial July 25 phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Trump refers to Yovanovitch as “bad news” and said, “She’s going to go through some things.”

Yovanovitch is scheduled to testify behind closed doors on Friday as part of the House impeachment inquiry against Trump.

While the congressman is not named in the indictment, details from the document and Federal Election Commission records point to it being Texas Republican Pete Sessions, who lost his reelection bid in 2018.

In a statement Thursday evening, Sessions said he “cannot confirm” he is the unnamed congressman in the court papers. But he vowed to defend himself against allegations of wrongdoing and pointed out that the indictment said: “The defendants concealed the scheme from the candidates, campaigns and federal regulators.”

Sessions confirmed that he met with Parnas and Fruman several times but says he never took any official action after those meetings.

Sessions did say, however, that after consulting with “several congressional colleagues,” he wrote a letter to the secretary of state expressing concerns about Yovanovitch and her reported disparagement of Trump to others.

In a separate alleged scheme, Parnas and Fruman allegedly worked with Correia and Kukushkin to make political donations — funded by an unnamed foreign national — to politicians and candidates at the state level to try to win their help securing licenses for a recreational marijuana business.

According to the indictment, Parnas was born in Ukraine and Fruman in Belarus. Both are now U.S. citizens.

The indictment is not their only ongoing legal challenge.

They were also subpoenaed by House lawmakers as part of the impeachment inquiry for their roles helping Giuliani dig up information in Ukraine on Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Parnas has told NPR that he worked as a fixer to help arrange meetings for Giuliani with current and former Ukrainian officials, including prosecutors.

Parnas and Fruman had been called to testify this week. Although even before their indictment, they were not expected to show up for their closed-door depositions.

President Trump, when asked about having been photographed with them, said on Thursday, “I don’t know those gentlemen. Now it’s possible I have a picture with them because I have a picture with everyone.”

“Maybe they were clients of Rudy, you’d have to ask Rudy. I just don’t know,” Trump added.

Trump also said he hadn’t talked to Giuliani about the matter and said, “We have nothing to do with it.”

The Goldfish Tariff: Fancy Pet Fish Among The Stranger Casualties Of The Trade War

Goldfish, like these showcased at Tokyo’s Nihonbashi Art Aquarium, have been bred in China over centuries, into forms so varied and rare that one can be worth hundreds of dollars.

What do goldfish have to do with the global trade balance?

That’s a question that has Ken Fischer reeling. He sells rare goldfish. And goldfish — the live pet, not the snack food — are tucked in on page 31 of list three of Chinese imports that face tariffs of 25%.

The goldfish tariff, like so many tariffs from the list, might seem negligible for someone buying a $10 common pet-store fish — the basic bright-orange kind one might get at a carnival.

The math is very different for sellers like Fischer. His Michigan company is Dandy Orandas, named for a type of fancy goldfish. It deals in top-shelf fish — telescoping eyes, calico colors, feather-like fins — that can go for well over $100 apiece.

“My income is literally cut in half by tariffs,” Fischer says. As a U.S. importer of a Chinese good, he is the one on the hook to pay the tariff.

Goldfish are among hundreds of products caught in the wide net cast by the Trump administration’s trade war with China. The countries reached “phase one” of a trade deal on Friday, averting a new tariff increase that had been slated to kick in this week. Yet, the tentative truce doesn’t undo existing tariffs. The White House has argued that reeling in Chinese imports would, among other things, also lure back jobs and factories to America.

For aquarium goldfish, China is not simply a source, but a motherland. There, goldfish have been bred over centuries into forms so varied and unusual that some enthusiasts and aquarists consider them a living art form.

Ryukin goldfish swim at the “Art Aquarium 2016” exhibition in Tokyo.

A scroll through Fischer’s website is a parade of gauzy fins and luminescent scales. There’s the butterfly telescope with exaggerated protruding eyes and two tails that fan out horizontally like wings. The delicate veiltail with a sail-like dorsal fin. The pearlscale goldfish that looks studded with beads. One fan favorite is the ranchu, which loosely resembles a plump potato with a cheeky pug-like face.

Prices for high-quality grown fish can run $125 to $300 on average. Fischer says he has sold higher-end specimen for over $1,000. Most pet stores will carry some cheaper but still fancy types like orandas with raspberry-like growths atop their heads.

As tariffs escalated earlier this year, Fischer took stock of his online business. It’s a one-man operation, importing about 6,000 goldfish a year. Fischer’s home is their care center and habitat with dozens of tanks and tubs plus an indoor pool.

When tariffs hit 25%, “I just said, ‘Screw it, I’m not going to play this game, I’m not going to work for nothing,” Fischer says. He decided to stop importing more fish.

In 2018, the U.S. bought more than $1.2 million worth of live ornamental freshwater fish from China, according to trade data from the U.S. Census Bureau. This covers goldfish and related crucian carp.

But Fischer gets frustrated by a comparison to another number: The U.S. trade deficit last year soared to a 10-year high of $621 billion.

“A small niche business like mine shouldn’t be part of the equation,” he says. The U.S. Trade Representative’s office did not comment on why the government decided otherwise.

There are goldfish breeders in other countries, including the U.S., but “the selection is still pretty limited because here in the U.S. we just don’t have nearly the availability of the exotic breed,” says Meredith Clawson, long-time goldfish keeper and author on the hobby.

“For fancy goldfish enthusiasts like me, the rare ones can only be gotten in places like China,” Clawson says.

Breeding high-quality goldfish can be a labor-intensive affair, which contributes to the high price tag. And it can take years for a fancy goldfish to grow to a good size.

At Chinese farms, Fischer says, workers cull through millions of fry, or baby fish, with tablespoon-sized nets, spotting deformed or otherwise undesirable fish. They repeat the procedure as fry grow, sifting through acres and acres of ponds.

“It’s not something that comes off an assembly line,” says Joe Hiduke, sales manager at Florida-based wholesaler 5D Tropical. “So it’s not like all of a sudden, we can be buying goldfish from a different goldfish factory.”

Hiduke’s company sells fish to stores that include large U.S. pet chains. Hiduke says he can pass on some costs to distributors and retailers, but 5D Tropical has contract obligations with larger chains that reassess what fish to stock and how much to charge only about once a year.

“Our options are either to sell these fish at a loss or not fill the product for the stores,” Hiduke says, “in which case — we are evaluated very regularly on our fill rate, and if the fill rate suffers, then we potentially are losing more business than just those goldfish.”

In a statement, PetSmart said the company was evaluating the tariffs and strategies to deal with them, working with partners to “manage the potential impact.” A spokeswoman for rival Petco told NPR that the company was “not aware of any impact on the price or availability of goldfish at Petco related to tariffs.”

For Fischer, the uncertainty of the trade war — so often decried by corporate CEOs and trade groups — has become a matter of livelihood.

When he stopped importing goldfish to avoid tariffs, Fischer shut down his business for a few months. He hadn’t had a break in a while, and he hoped that the tariffs would go away. They didn’t. And he couldn’t afford to stay closed.

“So I went ahead and bit the bullet and I just paid $10,000 (in tariffs) on a $40,000 shipment of fish, so that I could continue trying to make a living,” Fischer says. “But the numbers aren’t adding up.”

He says he can’t easily raise prices — there’s a lot of competition, and ultimately, fancy goldfish are a luxury. So he’s spinning his wheels, as he puts it, trying to decide when to cut bait.

What is Lionel Messi's record against English teams?

The Argentine is undoubtedly one of the best players of all time but how does he get on when he comes up against Premier League opposition?

Lionel Messi. For years, we have all speculated what would it be like to see a player of his talent come to England and play in the Premier League.

Now it looks like that will never happen, and we are only treated to fleeting glimpses when he gets to run riot against the Premier League’s top sides in the Champions League.

Messi put on a masterclass on Wednesday to down Tottenham, capping his performance with two calm finishes to score past his World Cup nemesis Hugo Lloris.

But how did Barcelona’s talisman perform on his previous visits to England, and against Premier League clubs home and away?

Messi struggled during his early appearances against Premier League sides as it took him nine games against English clubs before he contributed to a goal – an assist for Andres Iniesta against Chelsea in the 2009 Semi-final.

On top of this, when he makes the trip from Spain to England, he is nowhere near as prolific, compared to his overall record, scoring just six goals in 14 games played in England.

His 10th appearance against an English club saw the Barca forward finally break his goal duck. Manchester United were his victims with a memorable header in the 2009 Champions League final in Rome.

Since then, the Argentine has caught fire, scoring 19 in his next 17 appearances against Premier League opposition, including a spectacular hat-trick against Manchester City and a memorable four-goal haul against Arsenal. Messi is currently on a run of six consecutive games against English clubs where he has scored, which does not bode well for Spurs.

Messi’s favourite English opponent is Arsenal. The five-time Ballon d’Or winner has been a constant thorn in the Gunners’ side, netting nine times in just six outings against the London club.

Chelsea were a club Messi seemingly couldn’t get to grips with, failing to score in his first eight outings against the Blues. During this period, he also missed a penalty in the 2012 semi-final which cost his team a place in the final.

When you talk about Messi’s goalscoring record against English clubs, a slow start really skews how good he actually has been. Overall his record stands at 29 appearances, 22 goals and six assists. 

No other country’s teams have suffered as much as England against the Argentine, as 28 total goal contributions additionally mark his best record in the European competition by nation.



Team Appearances Goals Assists
Arsenal 6 9 1
Chelsea 10 3 3
Liverpool 2 0 0
Man United 4 2 1
Man City 6 6 1
Tottenham 1 2 0

table.tableizer-table { font-size: 14px; border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #CCC; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #00A9CE; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }