Ellison: 'Begin investigations' on impeaching Trump

Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, a leading candidate in the race to lead the Democratic Party, called for impeachment “investigations” over President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE’s conduct in his first weeks in office.  “I think that Donald Trump has already done a number of things which legitimately raise the question of impeachment,” Ellison said Wednesday night during CNN’s debate among the eight candidates to lead the Democratic National Committee. ADVERTISEMENTHe went on to accuse Trump of being in violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which prohibits a president from receiving payments or gifts from foreign states. In the mind of Ellison and others, Trump’s ownership of his Washington, D.C., hotel, which has been frequented by foreign diplomats, puts him in violation of that law.  Trump has said he will donate that money to the Treasury.  Ellison added that he doesn’t believe impeachment discussions are only about Trump, but about protecting the “integrity” of the presidency.   “We need to begin investigations not to go after Donald Trump, but protect the presidency of the United States to make sure nobody can monetize the presidency and make profit off it for his own gain,” he said.  Democrats will meet in Atlanta on Saturday to choose their next chair from the eight candidates. Ellison is seen as a front-runner, alongside former Labor Secretary Tom Perez.  Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

Guilty as Charged: Duke Energy to Pay Record Fine for Coal Ash Crimes

Duke Energy pleaded guilty on Thursday to environmental crimes and has agreed to pay a record $102 million in fines and restitution for years of illegal pollution, ignored warnings, and poorly maintained infrastructure.

U.S. District Court Judge Malcolm Howard said it is the largest federal criminal fine in North Carolina history.

But some environmentalists insist the punishment is insufficient, given the damage Duke continues to wreak in local communities. Just last month, the company was forced to start delivering bottled water to people with tainted wells close to several of its coal ash pits.

Of the $102 million, $68 million is a criminal penalty assessed under the federal Clean Water Act—believed to be among the largest such fines under the 43-year-old law. The rest of the settlement will go toward environmental projects in North Carolina and Virginia. The company will also be placed on a five-year probation, under which it will be monitored for compliance with the Clean Water Act. If it violates the law while on probation, Duke could be subject to further action by the court.

“Companies that cut corners and contaminate waters on which communities depend, as Duke did here, will be held accountable.”
—Cynthia Giles, EPA

“Today we said that big companies will be held accountable,” declared U.S. Attorney Thomas Walker of Raleigh, whose office convened the grand jury that led to Duke’s guilty pleas to nine misdemeanors. According to Walker’s office, four of the charges are the direct result of the massive 2014 coal ash spill into the Dan River near Eden, North Carolina. The remaining violations were discovered as the scope of the investigation broadened based on allegations of historical violations at the companies’ other facilities.

Still, as Southern Environmental Law Center senior attorney John Suttles pointed out, “What this admission of guilt does not do is clean up the coal ash that continues to leak into our water supplies, into our rivers.”

In February 2014, 39,000 tons of coal ash—a toxic waste product generated by coal-fired electric power plants—spilled into the Dan River, coating the waterway and contaminating the ecosystem. Prosecutors said Duke, which in 2014 earned $1.4 billion as the largest energy utility in the nation, twice refused to spend $20,000 on internal pipe inspections in the years before the devastating accident. Those inspections, prosecutors charged, would have revealed that the pipe was made of 60-year-old corrugated metal, not the concrete that Duke engineers supposed.

“They should have been monitoring better, they should have been fixing what they saw, they should have been listening to their employees,” Assistant Attorney General John C. Cruden, who supervises the prosecution of environmental crimes at the U.S. Justice Department, told the Associated Press. “If they had done that, the spill we saw would not have occurred.”

What’s more, according to Raleigh’s News & Observer, Duke agreed in court filings that for years it failed to act on other recommendations to monitor pipes for leakage from the ash ponds.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT